1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Organization |
Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. |
Audience has difficulty following presentation because of sudden jumps in the logical flow. |
The team presents information in a logical sequence that audience can follow. |
The team presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow easily. |
Slides |
The slides have multiple spelling or grammatical errors, or contain no appropriate graphical support. |
The slides have a few spelling or grammatical errors. Graphics are minimal or unhelpful. |
The slides are largely free of typos. Graphics are useful. |
The slides are well balanced, clear and free of errors. Graphics are enlightening and support the presentation well. |
Elocution |
The team mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly to be heard. |
The team incorrectly pronounces certain terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. |
The team is clear, Student pronounces most words correctly, and speaks articulately. |
The team makes good use of pauses and emphasis, speaks in an engaging way. |
Subject Knowledge |
The team does not have a grasp of information and cannot answer questions about the subject. |
The team is uncomfortable with information and is only able to answer questions in a rudimentary way. |
The team is at ease with topic, and able to answer all questions satisfactorily. |
The team demonstrates deep knowledge of the subject. Questions were answered thoroughly, often with insight. |
Functionality |
There is essentially no functionality. |
There is minimal functionality. The product isn't usable, but some things do work. |
The product is useable and supports basic or critical features with enough reliability to be useful. |
Basic functionality is robust and reliable. Optional or extended features are implemented and mostly work. |